Free Vegetarian Meal Planner

bleep

What the bleep do we (k) now?

This is a documentation that you need not look really, unless you're interested in how postmodern e Age clouded their heads.
In most obscure way, it quantum physics postmodern Alisher phenomena associated with he arbitrariness sphilosophie. Interestingly, most of the falls inherent contradiction not on: if there is no truth, then it can certainly not be proven by scientific methods and theories, as the film tries.
If there is no mandatory truth, one can also show that, because that would be indeed a binding truth. Thus, there is therefore still a truth?
truth is unfortunately mistaken again and again with certainty . On Certainty, we have never, but that does not mean that there is no truth There. Much of what we know is certainly true - we can only generally do not always know what it ...
Quantum physics contains no contradictions the way - otherwise they would not be physics. It is mathematically consistent ! Only this much can be incompatible with our everyday experience reconcile. And with good reason: our daily life is dominated by the classical physics after Newton - supplemented only with large masses or high speed en by Einstein . The wave function plays a minor role - they collapses as soon occur en interaction. And in our world there are constant interactions between the atoms and elementary particles . Therefore, quantum effects come in areas where many parts are interconnected, not to wear!
The documentation suggests, however, that also works the macrocosm "in truth" according to quantum physics principles, so there is no object constancy there. And so that is obviously proved that the world is determined by the observer. So there is no objective e truth (not the objective quantum physics, which is based on the documentation), but only a subjective e. The world is what I thinking up to me. Only stupid when I get on the stupid idea of having a car accident ...

Should You Tie Your Hair Up If You Have Big

Alien Nation

The probability that there is on other planets in the universe forms of life is very high. But how likely is it that makes it a contact between two life forms come from different planets? It depends very much on the distance . If by chance two busy Planets in the solar system are the same, it is huge. In all other cases, but it approaches very close to zero. Why is that?
There are several reasons: First, there are the gigantic distance en, prevail in our cosmos, and grow at that. The laws of nature allow information sübertragung with maximum speed of light. That is, direct communication will hardly be possible. With trips to other stars is more difficult, matter to win by increasing acceleration of inertia and weight. The energy that is spent for the acceleration is, with increasing More and more speed in inert mass implemented so that it is impossible with a solid object even close to getting at the speed of light . At the same time expands inexorably, the universe, that is, the distances between the systems and galaxies are always larger.
As a way out of this dilemma stayed there, only the so-called wormholes . But these are very hypothetical and has not yet been demonstrated. If there is it, it is still not clear whether they are passable, too. More likely is that matter during the passage of the entire information sgehalt loses - living one can not be upheld. black holes destroy information . In addition, it would then actually also white holes give that spew namely the matter again. This would be so in any case a one-way street ... Thus, it is
extremely unlikely from a scientific perspective that can lead to contacts between different life forms from different corners of the universe. In the earthly realm that is not yet even occurred. There is no evidence so far or clear signs of extraterrestrial en intelligences on Earth. Crop circles are not serious form of contact (rather primitive and amateurish). All that has been submitted to demonstrate how to easily explain and ground, without the perverse interpretation of an extraterrestrial origin necessarily suggest. (Or to William Ockham : Entia non sunt sine necessitate multiplicanda .)
addition, it is more than doubtful that extraterrestrial intelligence s would kindly communicate with us. We had it with people from other planets, if we could reach them, certainly not. Our history shows up in the present day that we deal with strangers, never squeamish. Not with other forms of life on our own Planet. Colonialism and conquest, enslavement and always walked with pogrom s associated to the present day (where it's mostly about oil or other resources). And with the destruction of the environment through the exploitation of nature. The euphemische expression for the modern American imperialism is the way globalization .
aliens would also be happy as a replacement for divine beings - almost perfect and absolute discretion and good. In addition, more anthropomorphic ! But this is very far-fetched and unrealistic. Even alien intelligences would n their own interest in the foreground and therefore to our interests little considerate. Finally we take the interests of other hardly regard: We buy cheap textiles, even if they are associated with child labor. And we buy cheap food (and then also complain often about the poor quality , so we buy over-priced and unnecessary supplements ), although this means unworthy farming and loss of rural livelihoods if the farmers not benefit accordingly. The food for this animal meat masses comes from anyway Latin America after the own production is insufficient for it. We are happy to eat the cheap tilapia , though, people in Tanzania to malnutrition and protein deficiency. We want to shop on weekends, but even a holiday. We do not pay taxes and social contributions , but take social benefits and a functioning health care to complete. We want cheap products , but high income. And when it comes to layoffs, the shares to rise as wonderful!
It is therefore clear: No. Fortunately Aliens In Our World . Sed homo lupus !